Number theory
WithdrawnWithdrawn 10 Sept 2026
PRIOR_EXTERNAL_FORMALIZATION (Green 44, also Erdos 1202, was resolved negatively by Price and GPT-5.4 Pro. The public plby/lean-proofs Erdos1202 counterexample predates pool admission; its unchanged source and an exact-target bridge were independently kernel-checked on September 9. See EXTERNAL-SOLUTIONS-2026-09-10.md for public sources.)
Formal statement
Proof target
import FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«44»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Green44.green_44" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Original conjecture (Lean type)
True ↔
∀ (N : ℕ) (p : Fin 1000 → ℕ) (A : (i : Fin 1000) → Finset (ZMod (p i))),
have remaining := {x ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N | ∀ (i : Fin 1000), ↑x ∉ A i};
(∀ (i : Fin 1000), Nat.Prime (p i)) →
StrictMono p → p 999 ^ 10 < N ^ 9 → (∀ (i : Fin 1000), (A i).card = p i / 2) → 10 * remaining.card ≤ NOriginal conjecture source: FormalConjectures/GreensOpenProblems/44.lean
References
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.
Our channel is in the Bittensor Discord server. Join the server first, then open the channel to send your report.